Newly Added: Unbroken Bonds (5/3), Detective Pikachu (3/29), Team Up (2/1), Lost Thunder (11/2)
To get started, enter search terms above. By default, only card names, sets, and numbers will be matched in the search results. Use the advanced search and search syntax to refine them further. For the completionist, all sets are available for viewing. Chance upon a random card if you’re indecisive.
Or, just check out the latest discussion below:
“…Vibrava’s Retreat Cost is 0.”
So is its Rating.
Played with this idea even before these comments, and with FFI Machamp you can deal 280 damage for three energies. Stormfront Machamp gives the most attacks possible. Also NosrednaTrebor, Empoleon also fits this criteria, although I was not aware Raichu did too!
wish this guy had either a better attack or ability. I’m big on having a draw support swampert and the art is really cool on this card as well.
My apologies. I normally look up cards, even if I remember them, just to make sure I’m not suffering a brain fart but this time, even though I didn’t play much while this mechanic was dominant, I was lazy and didn’t. Hench forgetting that they did indeed have their own bottom stats.
If I remember correctly, Lv.X forms aren’t actually a “Stage” of Evolution, however, counting as whatever Stage from which they Leveled-Up. BREAK Evolutions are their own Stage but lack their own bottom stats,…
enter Mallow! Though I don’t think anyone ever played it with this card
Lv.X cards actually do have bottom stats. Hence why I brought them up. They basically are a full Pokemon in their own right.
No. Nor could you use it to Bench half a BREAK Evolution or part of a Pokémon LEGEND card. The Pokémon card being put into play must be a full Pokémon in its own right, with all required stats. Level Up cards and BREAK Evolutions have no bottom stats (Weakness/Resistance/Retreat) so they’re as incomplete as the others I named.…and this is why I usually look up cards I “clearly” remember, just to be on the safe side. So why didn’t I do th…
Could I use this card to put a Pokemon Lv.X onto my bench? Theoretically speaking.
TL;DR: you can always search unless you have no deck. you can discard any supporter, and it activates regardless. THEN, if the supporter wouldn’t do anything, it fails. you’ve used your attack!
All card effects are completed on an “as much as you can fulfill” basis. The first part of the attack, “Search your deck for a Supporter card and discard it. Shuffle your deck afterward”, can ALWAYS be fulfilled, regardless of wether there are actually any supporters in your deck (unless there are 0 cards in your deck) because the contents of your deck are unknown to the game state (but the amount of cards in your deck IS known). YOU may know every card in your deck, and your OPPONENT may know …
What happens if I impersonate a supporter with requirements I don’t fulfill? Like Cyrus Prism Star, Red’s Challenge, or Archie’s Ace in the hole. The cards read like they have a requirement for playing them from your hand, which is separate from “the effect of the card” copied from Sableye
when I was younger and saw the preview of this card for the first time I couldn’t believe how good it looked. You’d never see an attack with so much power and so little energy in the EX era
Fun fact: this card has a typo (“You opponent”) and so does Team Magma’s Camerupt (“Mamga”). Both were printed in Worlds decks, and in the Worlds deck print the Team Magma’s Camerupt error was fixed… but the error remains even in the Worlds deck printing of Gastly!
DP-era and HS-era cards that refer to “Trainers” now refer to Items in Unlimited. The old definition and the modern definition actually existed together in the same format–in the 2011 format, there were HS cards with the old definition of “Trainer” and BLW cards with the new terminology of “Item”, and it was played this way.
If playing unlimited, would cards like this and Spiritomb AR 32 retain the original intent of the card and block Items, or use the post-B&W definitions and block all Trainers?
There’s at least Empoleon too!
It attaches itself as a Tool so I’m assuming the Pokémon to which it attaches itself must have an open “Tool slot”. So unless the Pokémon in question can equip multiple Tools, the answer is “no”.
If my active already has a tool attached to it, can Unown still attach itself to it?
Unfortunately only machamp and raichu have Breaks and Lv.X cards. But this machamp can swing for 260 after attacking once which is cool
You should be able to, sure! I don’t see anything stopping you from doing Machamp -> Machamp LV.X -> Machamp BREAK, and now I wanna go see what kinda combos that’d make with other Pokémon… hoo, boy.
Since Pokemon Lv.X have the same name as their regular form, could you level up your Machamp and then Break evolve it in am unlimited setting?
Yes, if an attack places an effect on your Pokémon, like the two you mentioned, Pokémon Ranger will get rid of it.
There are only a few things Pokémon Ranger can’t affect:
1) It won’t undo the damage or damage counters placed by an attack.
2) It won’t remove Special Conditions inflicted by an attack.
3) It won’t erase an attack having actually been used.
#3 needs a little more explanation. Mewtwo (XY – Evolutions 51/108) has an attack called “Barrier”, which states it cannot be used i…
if I use an attack that says “This Pokemon can’t use this attack during your next turn” or “This Pokemon can’t attack during you’re next turn” and then play this on my next turn, can said pokemon attack?
looks like they’ve continued with the tradition of incompatibility with their evolutions. It’s a shame because I really enjoyed evolving babies, especially in the EX and DPPt era where the evolved mons could benefit from having the baby card beneath them in different ways.
Wait so his first attack is just Electabuzz’s thunderpunch but more expensive? How did they get away with that kind of card design lol