“Hey! Learn our syntax here.”
- zoom
- jpg (187 KB)
- cred: nago
947
- ↓ 0.05
- ꩜ 0.31
- ↑ 4.99
Ability ⇢ Drastic Draw
When you play this Pokémon from your hand to evolve 1 of your Pokémon during your turn, you may draw 3 cards.
{C}{C} → Wing Attack : 100
illus. SATOSHI NAKAI
External: Pokemon.com ↗, Bulba ↗ · #ad / Affiliate Links: TCGplayer ↗, cardmarket ↗, Amazon ↗, eBay ↗
It feeds on the blood of living people and Pokémon. If it can’t drink any blood for even a short while, it becomes weak and unable to fly.
Stuart Newsby
Not a bad draw option. Could work well with Scoop-Up Net.
Nos
I use one in my GLC Darkness deck. It’s alright there, especially since the Obstagoon and Crobat lines both have good coming into play abilities that mesh well with being replayed using Nets or Scoop Ups
burma
The upcoming Alakazam evolution line from “Mega Evolution” has the same abilities as Golbat + Crobat here!
https://m.bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Alakazam_(Mega_Evolution_56)
cosmos77
so let me get your logic right. a TM isn’t a TM because it needs to spoonfeed you, but if an attack or ability does the same thing it’s the ‘same’ even though the names are different there’s no logic to your stupidity
Gaardus
Sure, there’s nothing wrong with mentally categorizing together effects that are functionally similar despite having different names. But “Technical Machine” is a term with specific in-game and in-universe meanings, and the claim that Paradox Rift featured the TCG’s first usage of the term in 14 years is objectively correct. The problem isn’t that absolutely everyone around you is stupid, it’s that you’re misinterpreting other people’s comments and immediately lobbing insults based on your own deficiencies in reading comprehension and lack of knowledge on the subject matter.
koshkadelta
Why are you acting like this?
neapolitan
arguing on a pokemon card forum is actually insane