“Hey! Learn our syntax here.”
- zoom
- jpg (131 KB)
- cred: P.P.
1.1K
- ↓ 0.49
- ꩜ 0.76
- ↑ 4.99
{C} → Super Fang : ?
Does damage to the Defending Pokémon equal to half the Defending Pokémon’s remaining HP (rounded up to the nearest 10).
illus. Ken Sugimori · LV.32
External: Bulba ↗ · #ad / Affiliate Links: TCGplayer ↗, cardmarket ↗, Amazon ↗, eBay ↗
Quarter-Turn
A “Super Fang” attack should be reprinted.
reshikrom64
It’d be kinda amusing to see this ‘Super Fang’ an Ace-Spec’d Black Kyurem.
Ambassador
The same trivia I posted on Base Set Raticate applies here – the “?” for the damage of Super Fang is exclusive to the EN print of the card. I actually vaguely remember the old WOTC rulebooks really making a big deal of “?” as a listed damage total, and I was left with the impression it would show up a lot, but it’s something they barely used themselves and was ultimately dropped when they stopped translating the cards – probably since “?” doesn’t really provide any meaningful information, there were no consistent rules of use as to when you’d add “?”, and so it’d be easy to forget to add it at all. Why bother?