“Hey! Learn our syntax here.”
- zoom
- png (671 KB)
- cred: nago
804
- ↓ 0.05
- ꩜ 0.17
- ↑ 100.00
{C} → Regi Gate
Search your deck for a Basic Pokémon and put it onto your Bench. Then, shuffle your deck.
{W}{W}{C} → Blizzard Bind : 100
If the Defending Pokémon is a Pokémon V, it can’t attack during your opponent’s next turn.
illus. aoki
External: Pokemon.com ↗, Bulba ↗ · #ad / Affiliate Links: TCGplayer ↗, cardmarket ↗, Amazon ↗, eBay ↗
With cold air that can reach temperatures as low as −328 degrees Fahrenheit, Regice instantly freezes any creature that approaches it.
Warnock 2022
ASR Regis are CRUSHIN IT.
https://archive.ph/9gX8i
Ambassador
Someone was asking me to look into a case where a judge at a Regionals had ruled that Blizzard Bind doesn’t stop Mew VMAX’s Cross Fusion Strike and gave some kind of explanation that Mew wasn’t attacking, it was “attacking with an effect, and Blizzard Bind doesn’t stop effects.” So they wanted to know whether this has its source in JP rulings.
A quick search pulled up nothing, so before I go all in on this – does this even make sense from the English POV? Even though it was confirmed by a head judge, it sounds like an errant ruling to me.
miro
Sounds like a load of barnacles to me; I doubt any actual judge would give a ruling like that. Cross Fusion Strike is an attack like any other attack and Mew VMAX would be unable to use it or any other attack if effected by Regice’s Blizzard Bind.
JP
This does not seem correct for an English ruling.
Ambassador
I figured not. Cheers.