Let’s ignore the fact that this is an abysmal pokemon in and of itself, what’s more notable is the art. An excellent example of artwork that illustrates an attack that the pokemon is capable of using. Honesty, more cards need to use artwork like this.
It needs a typed energy to have a 50% chance of doing the typical damage for a sindkkgle colorless energy attack (10) among basics, without any actual compensation as larger than average HP , a poké power/body or no retreat… Not well designed, it seems. A shame, because the illustration has a well adjust flavor to the attack name as Feyblade perceived
Amusingly, there is no strict better Treecko in the ex-card format. Better Treeckos the format have, but none of them are strictly better (better in all conceivable situations)
feyblade
Let’s ignore the fact that this is an abysmal pokemon in and of itself, what’s more notable is the art. An excellent example of artwork that illustrates an attack that the pokemon is capable of using. Honesty, more cards need to use artwork like this.
Jamie
My only problem is the art makes it look like it would hurt a lot more than (maybe) 10 damage.
Curtis
IF that’s what 10 damage feels like, I don’t want to be hit with 120.
Pidgeotto the master one
It needs a typed energy to have a 50% chance of doing the typical damage for a sindkkgle colorless energy attack (10) among basics, without any actual compensation as larger than average HP , a poké power/body or no retreat… Not well designed, it seems. A shame, because the illustration has a well adjust flavor to the attack name as Feyblade perceived
Pidgeotto the master one
Amusingly, there is no strict better Treecko in the ex-card format. Better Treeckos the format have, but none of them are strictly better (better in all conceivable situations)